| MENU UTAMA |
|
Peer Review Proces
Peer Review Process
- Authors submit their manuscripts online to the Journal of Reflective Education (JRE) through the journal’s submission system.
- The manuscript will undergo an initial screening by the editorial board to assess its alignment with the journal’s focus and scope in education, compliance with the official JRE article template, and plagiarism screening with a similarity index not exceeding 30%.
- Manuscripts that meet the criteria in terms of scope, formatting, and plagiarism threshold (≤30%) will be forwarded to reviewers for further evaluation.
- The manuscript should consist of the following sections: introduction, research methodology, results and discussion, conclusion, and references. Reviewers will evaluate the manuscript based on academic quality, originality, clarity, and contribution to the field of education.
- The review process is conducted through a double-blind peer review system, ensuring that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous, and may involve several rounds of revision to meet the journal’s quality standards.
- Based on the reviewers’ recommendations, the editor will make the final decision regarding the manuscript: accepted, revised, or rejected.
- If the manuscript is accepted, the editor will notify the author and request confirmation for publication in the Journal of Reflective Education (JRE).
- Authors are required to create an account in the journal system by completing the required personal and academic information prior to submission.

